California Governor Primary 2026: Becerra, Hilton Advance as Steyer Narrowly Misses Cut

In a high-stakes open primary that tested the shifting political currents of the Golden State, former U.S. Attorney General Xavier Becerra and conservative commentator Steve Hilton emerged as the top two vote-getters, securing their spots in the November general election for California governor. With over 9.2 million votes tallied, the results underscore a deeply polarized electorate—and a surprisingly strong performance by billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer, who finished just 2 percentage points behind Hilton.

Top-Two Primary Delivers Familiar Face vs. Fresh Challenger

California's jungle primary system, which sends the two highest vote-getters to the general regardless of party, once again produced a binary choice: a seasoned Democratic insider versus a Republican-backed outsider with a media-savvy brand. Becerra, who served as California’s attorney general before leading the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under President Biden, captured 28.1% of the vote—enough to position him as the front-runner heading into November.

Hilton, a former adviser to British Prime Minister David Cameron and a Fox News contributor, rallied the GOP base with a platform centered on fiscal conservatism, deregulation, and a strong critique of California's homelessness crisis. He secured 24.7% of the vote, edging out Steyer by nearly 170,000 ballots.

Becerra’s Path to the General: Dominance in Urban Strongholds

Becerra’s coalition relied heavily on California’s sprawling urban and suburban centers. In Los Angeles County, he beat Hilton by 6 points, while similar margins held in Santa Clara, Sacramento, and Contra Costa counties. His ability to pile up votes in the state’s most populous regions gave him a comfortable lead despite Hilton’s strength elsewhere.

“The numbers show that Becerra’s message of experience and stability resonates in the cities,” said political analyst Maria Torres. “But the general election will force him to broaden his appeal beyond the coastal metro areas.”

Becerra’s campaign leaned into his record as California’s top law enforcement officer and his work on the Affordable Care Act. He also drew support from the state’s powerful labor unions and Latino voters, a critical bloc that turned out in force for him in counties like Imperial and San Benito.

Steve Hilton: The Conservative Wild Card

Hilton outperformed expectations by dominating rural and inland regions. He carried Fresno by 13 points, Kern by 15, and Placer by 18, energizing voters who feel left behind by the state’s progressive policies. His campaign’s focus on public safety, water rights, and rolling back environmental regulations struck a chord in the Central Valley and the Sierra foothills.

“The data shows a clear geographical divide—Hilton is the candidate of the interior, while Becerra owns the coasts,” noted election forecaster David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report. “But with California’s population concentrated on the coast, Becerra enters the general as the clear favorite.”

Still, Hilton’s ability to draw 2.27 million votes in a primary—despite never holding elected office in the U.S.—signals a potential shift in Republican strategy. His British-accented, reform-minded rhetoric could help him appeal to moderate swing voters in a state where the GOP has been struggling for relevance.

Tom Steyer and Chad Bianco: The Also-Rans

Tom Steyer’s 22.8% showing was a surprise given his late entry and the crowded Democratic field. The billionaire climate activist poured millions into advertising and ground operations, winning San Francisco by 14 points and Santa Cruz by a slim margin. He even beat Becerra in Alameda County by 1.5 points. But it wasn’t enough to overcome his lack of statewide name recognition beyond environmental circles.

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, the most conservative candidate in the race, finished fourth with 10.2%. He ran a law-and-order campaign that appealed to the GOP’s most ardent supporters but failed to break through beyond his home turf—he won only Lassen County, a sparsely populated region in the far north.

What the County-by-County Results Reveal

The detailed vote breakdown offers a rich map of California’s current political landscape. In areas with predominantly Hispanic residents, Hilton actually led by 4 points—a notable finding, given historical Democratic strength among Latino voters. Meanwhile, in strong Trump counties, Hilton’s advantage ballooned to 17 points.

Becerra’s strongest margins came in deep-blue Harris counties (+4 points), while Hilton swept nearly every rural county. The suburban battlegrounds, often the decider in statewide races, were nearly tied—Becerra eked out a 0.52-point lead in smaller cities and suburbs.

What to Expect in the General Election

Before the primary, the Cook Political Report rated the November contest as “Solidly Democratic,” and those expectations remain intact. California hasn’t elected a Republican governor since Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006, and the state’s Democratic voter registration advantage continues to grow.

However, Hilton’s ability to unify the GOP base and tap into frustration with homelessness, crime, and high taxes could make the race more competitive than the ratings suggest. Becerra will need to defend the Biden administration's record while also offering a forward-looking vision for California’s post-pandemic recovery.

Mail-in ballots are still being counted—election officials have until one week after Election Day to accept ballots postmarked by the deadline. As of early reporting, roughly half of the expected ballots had been tallied. In the 2024 primary, it took 10 days before 95% of results were known.

The next few weeks will reveal whether Steyer’s supporters flock to Becerra or stay home, and whether Hilton can build on his rural momentum to become a true contender. One thing is certain: California’s experiment with outsider politics is far from over.

Disclaimer - All celebrity-related content, information, and images on this website are based on publicly available online sources and AI-generated insights/data. Information such as biography, age, career, personal details, and images may change without notice over time. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or timeliness of any information or imagery displayed on this website. This content is provided for general informational purposes only.